The Framework
Five core values and eight guiding principles for building an AI-ready organization through your people.
Five Core Values
These values define how you measure, build, and operate your organization in the AI era. They are not nice-to-haves. They determine your competitive survival.
Right People,
Right Work
Over Headcount and Hierarchy
The number of people in your company is no longer a meaningful measure of your capacity. A company of fifteen people with the right AI capabilities can outperform a company of a hundred and fifty with the wrong ones.
What matters is not how many people you have, but whether the people you have are the right people doing the right things with the right tools. Growth in the AI era does not mean hiring more. It means enabling your existing team to operate at a fundamentally higher level of impact.
In practice:
Before every hire, ask: is this a role that requires a human?
Measure team effectiveness by outcomes and impact, not headcount.
The CEO personally owns organizational design.
An AI-Powered
Living Playbook
Over Static Policies
AI itself can be at the center of making the playbook a living system. AI can document processes as they happen. AI can flag when a documented process has drifted from actual practice.
Your playbook is not a document locked in a folder. It is a continuously updating system that reflects how work actually gets done, not how you hoped it would get done.
In practice:
The playbook captures what humans do AND what AI does.
AI-powered documentation tools record and update in real time.
90-day staleness alerts. Every employee can search and suggest changes.
Radical
Transparency
Over Comfortable Ambiguity
When AI is involved in decisions that affect people, transparency is not optional. Employees have the right to know when AI is influencing decisions about their work.
The comfortable ambiguity of "the system decided" is not acceptable. Black boxes are not leadership. Transparency is a prerequisite for trust.
In practice:
When AI contributes to performance evaluation, employee sees AI input alongside manager assessment.
Clear escalation path for AI concerns. Regular internal updates on AI usage.
Measured
Outcomes
Over Assumed Progress
How do you evaluate the effectiveness of a human-AI team? You cannot rely on the same metrics that worked in the pre-AI era. You need new language and new measurement.
If you cannot measure it, you cannot manage it. And if you cannot manage your people strategy, your AI strategy will fail.
In practice:
Key metrics: AI Leverage Ratio, Right-Person-Right-Work Score, Employee Confidence Index, Time to Impact for New Hires, Voluntary Attrition of High Performers, Reskilling Velocity.
Company-Wide
AI Orchestration
Over Siloed Experiments
AI adoption team by team without coordination is not a strategy. It is chaos with a technology budget. Human-agent orchestration must happen at the company level.
When every team is experimenting independently, you have no strategy. You have fragmentation masquerading as innovation.
In practice:
Work architecture map. Every AI deployment evaluated for impact on surrounding human work.
CEO reviews quarterly. Cross-functional coordination mandatory.
These values are not aspirational. They are operational. They define how decisions get made, how people get evaluated, how the organization gets structured, and how you measure success.
Eight Guiding Principles
The values set direction. The principles help you navigate the daily decisions. Use these to make decisions consistent with your values.
Purpose Filters Everything
Every role, process, and AI deployment exists to serve the organization's purpose. Not to reduce cost. Not to cut headcount. Not because the technology is cool. Purpose first. Always.
Inquiry Over Compliance
The strongest organizations ask the hardest questions. Anyone can ask "Why did the system recommend this?" and get an answer in 48 hours. Curiosity is encouraged. Compliance is minimized.
Recognize the Human,
Not the Tool
When AI increases output, recognition goes to the humans who directed and improved the AI's work. A developer using Copilot to ship faster is more valuable, not less. The person is the leverage point.
Develop Strengths
That AI Cannot Replicate
Judgment. Relationship building. Creative problem-solving. Empathy. Development shifts from "learn the process" to "master the judgment." These skills become more valuable as AI handles routine work.
Structured Empowerment
Decision rights matrix showing which decisions employees make independently, which need consultation, which need approval. Same for AI. Clarity, not chaos. Empowerment requires structure.
Human Primacy
with Economic Honesty
When conflict between AI efficiency and human well-being, humans win. But make the economic case honestly. Human Impact Assessment before eliminating any role.
Algorithmic Transparency
Every AI-driven decision affecting a person must be explainable and challengeable. One-paragraph explanation. Five business day human review. No black boxes affecting people.
Continuous Reskilling
as a Survival Imperative
"Am I going to be okay?" AI will change most roles within 24 months. Minimum % of payroll for reskilling. Living skills taxonomy. Your people stay competitive, or they leave.
These principles are not idealistic. They are strategic. Follow them, and you have a clear, consistent foundation for decision-making. Ignore them, and you will face the same problems everyone else does: resistance, confusion, and attrition.
Next Steps
Ready to assess your organization?
Take the 5-minute PeopleOps Assessment to score your organization across these five values, understand your gaps, and get specific next steps.
Take the Assessment →